So, Joe Flacco is a Bengal. For $6 million, the 41-year-old quarterback will be wearing stripes, presumably holding a clipboard behind Joe Burrow. This move is supposed to be about veteran presence and insurance. It feels more like a misstep for a team with Super Bowl aspirations.
Look, Flacco had a nice little run with the Browns last year. He threw for 1,616 yards and 13 touchdowns in five regular-season starts, leading them to a playoff berth. That was a feel-good story. But it was also an anomaly. Before that, Flacco hadn't thrown for more than nine touchdowns in a season since 2018. His last full season as a starter was 2017 with the Ravens, where he threw 18 touchdowns and 13 interceptions. He’s been a backup for a reason.
The Bengals already have Jake Browning, who stepped in admirably for Burrow last season, throwing for 1,936 yards and 12 touchdowns in seven starts. Browning's 2023 completion percentage of 70.4% was surprisingly good. He led Cincinnati to a 4-3 record in those starts, including a memorable 34-31 overtime win against the Minnesota Vikings in Week 15. What exactly does Flacco, at 41, bring that Browning doesn't, other than a Super Bowl ring from 2012? Experience is one thing, but declining physical skills are another. Flacco's average air yards per attempt have been steadily dropping for years.
Six million dollars for a backup quarterback, especially one who's likely the *third* string if Browning performs in camp? That's a hefty chunk of change for a team that needs to pay Ja'Marr Chase and Tee Higgins. Patrick Mahomes' backup, Blaine Gabbert, made $1.5 million last year. The Eagles paid Marcus Mariota $5 million, and he was supposed to be the clear No. 2. Flacco’s contract feels like an overpay driven by a brief, albeit impressive, stretch of games in Cleveland.
Real talk: If Burrow goes down again, are the Bengals truly expecting Flacco to replicate his Browns magic? That Browns offensive line was playing out of its mind. The Bengals' offensive line, while improved, is still a work in progress. Remember, Flacco's career high in passing yards was 3,986 in 2016. He’s not going to suddenly turn back the clock and become a gunslinger again in Cincinnati. This isn’t a smart allocation of resources.
Here's the thing: The Bengals are in a championship window. Every decision should be geared towards maximizing their chances with Burrow healthy. Bringing in a Super Bowl-winning QB, even one past his prime, creates an unnecessary dynamic. If Browning struggles in a preseason game, or even a regular-season snap, the chants for Flacco will start. It’s human nature. It’s what fans do.
This move could create a quarterback controversy where there shouldn't be one. Browning proved last year he can manage games and win. He led the Bengals to 30+ points in three of his seven starts. Flacco, for all his veteran wisdom, will be a distraction. The Bengals needed a stable, cheap backup. They got a potentially expensive headache.
**Bold Prediction:** Joe Flacco will throw fewer than 100 regular-season passing yards for the Bengals in 2024.